weathericon

The Stamford Times


marketplacetwitter
Sports blog: Stamford Sports Scene

Himes' FAA forum turns into discussion on health care



By ROBERT KOCH

Times Staff Writer


STAMFORD -- The topic was airplane traffic over Fairfield County, but many people at Stamford Government Center on Thursday night wanted to talk about health care reform in Washington, D.C.

Whether federal legislation now under discussion in Washington will help or harm the health of Americans depended upon whom you asked.

"Why is nothing addressed on tort reform?" asked Mary Ellen Cortigiano of Milford. "No. 2, are you going to live under the same healthcare plan?"

Congressman Jim Himes, D-4, said the bill before the U.S. House of Representatives doesn't address tort reform.

"(Tort reform) is not trivial, but it's also not the solution here," said Himes, who put costs associated with medical malpractice at 2 to 4 percent. "Will I live under the same health care plan? Absolutely."

About 100 people, including Stamford Mayor Dannel P. Malloy, attended the meeting arranged by Himes to give his constituents an opportunity to speak with FAA administrators about airplane noise and flight paths.

After an hour on airplanes, Himes opened the floor to other topics, and healthcare reform soon took center stage.

Voices rose, at times, between speakers who labeled the reform measures as "socialized medicine," and others who labeled private insurance companies the real "terror."

"I don't understand why so many people are terrified of a government option. I'm more terrified of the insurance companies," Jill Kovacs of Fairfield said.

John Piccolo of Stratford, however, said, "no matter what the government gets its hands on, it destroys it."

Earlier in the evening, a number of people waiting for the meeting to start spoke to The Hour about health care.

"I just wanted to tell (Himes) not to vote for the insurance bill as it is," Mike Feldman of Stamford said. "We have the best medical care in the world. (The bill) is going to raise taxes. Right now is not the time to change health insurance."

John Lawrence, another Stamford resident, said his daughter, a nurse, has lupus and was denied treatment by her health insurance company. He said he would like to see all Americans covered and insurance premiums capped.

"I'm very, very concerned -- we all are. This is a very, very serious issue," Lawrence said.

Joanna Heller of Cos Cob carried a sign reading "Medicare for All." She said she came to push for a single-payer health care system -- something Himes later stressed is not under consideration in Washington.

"I'm here to push for a single-payer system," Heller said. "It's the most efficient. It's the most economical. It makes the most sense."

Asked about the prospects of health care reform legislation being passed, Heller answered, "Very poor."


COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in The Stamford Times community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines. Basically, be civil, smart, on-topic and free from profanity. Don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read! And remember: We may miss some, so we need your help to police these comments. Please identify the comment, the story and why you think it's objectionable.
Read the commenting guidelines

Add a new comment

I think we need the same system we used to close military bases about 15 years ago: a panel can propose a Bill with Congress only getting an up-or-down vote.

I find it very hard to see how 435 people - most of whom are beholden to one or another lobby - can present the President with something intelligent to sign.

Employer-based private insurance is a historical anomaly and doesn''t adequately spread demographic risk. This is the forest; seems like most folks only want to yell about the trees.....



Posted by: Paul Steed | Aug 10, 2009
reply


There is plenty of opportunity to improve the healthcare delivery system without handing it over to the government.
We have a good system, it''s expensive and we need to improve on that. Here are several things that can be done almost immediately but continue to be ignored:
1) Some level of tort reform
2) Immigration reform so illegals stop get free healthcare without paying ANY taxes
3) Have the government pay their fair share of Medicare and Medicaid so costs don''t get shifted onto consumers
4) Pharmaceutical reform so people in the U.S. can buy drugs at the same prices as Canada and Mexico
5) Removing mandates so that people can buy a BASIC health plan that doesn''t cover wigs, Viagra, and other coverage viewed as non-essential
6) Insurance reform that covers pre-exisiting coverage conditions and capping of rate increases
7) Have insurance competition across state lines to increase market competition
8) Foster better transparency in health care outcomes and have insureds pay a portion of every bill. The market will gravitate to those providers who are priced more competitively and get better results.

There are many things that we can do to improve our current system.
You don''t amputate the leg when you have a sprained ankle do you?
What is presented in this bill will be a disaster for this country and an expensive one at that.

Posted by: Brian Rogers | Aug 11, 2009
reply