weathericon

The Stamford Times
Searches last 14 days only
Check out our new sports blog!
Stamford Sports Scene

Jury indicts UBS bank official in tax scheme



By Martha Brannigan

McClatchy Newspapers


MIAMI -- Raoul Weil, head of wealth management operations for Swiss banking giant UBS, has been indicted for conspiring to help thousands of U.S. clients dodge federal income taxes by hiding assets in secret offshore accounts.

The indictment, handed up by a federal grand jury in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and unsealed Wednesday, alleges that between 2002 and 2007 Weil oversaw the Swiss bank's cross-border business, which helped about 20,000 U.S. clients conceal about $20 billion in assets in secret Swiss bank accounts. The business generated about $200 million in annual revenue for the bank.

Weil faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

The indictment says bankers solicited new business from U.S. clients at Art Basel Miami Beach, a lavish event that UBS sponsors.

In a statement, U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta said, "Every American who pays his or her taxes should be offended that a select few use anonymous offshore accounts to avoid paying their fair share."

UBS officials weren't immediately available to comment.

Weil is the second UBS banker implicated in the scheme. In June, Bradley Birkenfeld, a former bank director, pleaded guilty to helping Lighthouse Point billionaire developer Igor Olenicoff dodge federal income taxes. Birkenfeld's sentencing hearing has been postponed several times while he continues to assist investigators in implicating other people in the scheme.

UBS has its North American headquarters in Stamford.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in The Stamford Times community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines. Basically, be civil, smart, on-topic and free from profanity. Don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read! And remember: We may miss some, so we need your help to police these comments. Please identify the comment, the story and why you think it's objectionable.
Read the commenting guidelines